Showing posts with label Ineternet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ineternet. Show all posts

Sex, drugs more common in hyper-texting teens


Sex, drugs more common in hyper-texting teens - Teens who text 120 times a day or more — and there seems to be a lot of them — are more likely to have had sex or used alcohol and drugs than kids who don't send as many messages, according to provocative new research.

The study's authors aren't suggesting that "hyper-texting" leads to sex, drinking or drugs, but say it's startling to see an apparent link between excessive messaging and that kind of risky behavior.

The study concludes that a significant number of teens are very susceptible to peer pressure and also have permissive or absent parents, said Dr. Scott Frank, the study's lead author.

"If parents are monitoring their kids' texting and social networking, they're probably monitoring other activities as well," said Frank, an associate professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

Frank was scheduled to present the study Tuesday at a meeting of the American Public Health Association in Denver.

The study was done at 20 public high schools in the Cleveland area last year, and is based on confidential paper surveys of more than 4,200 students.

It found that about one in five students were hyper-texters and about one in nine are hyper-networkers — those who spend three or more hours a day on Facebook and other social networking websites.

About one in 25 fall into both categories.

Hyper-texting and hyper-networking were more common among girls, minorities, kids whose parents have less education and students from a single-mother household, the study found.

Frank's study is billed as one of the first studies to look at texting and social networking and whether they are linked to actual sexual intercourse or to other risky behaviors.

"This study demonstrates that it's a legitimate question to explore," said Douglas Gentile, who runs the Media Research Lab at Iowa State University.

The study found those who text at least 120 times a day are nearly three-and-a-half times more likely to have had sex than their peers who don't text that much. Hyper-texters were also more likely to have been in a physical fight, binge drink, use illegal drugs or take medication without a prescription.

Compared to the heavy texters, the hyper-networkers were not as likely to have had sex, but more likely to have been involved in other risky behaviors like drinking or fighting.

A Kaiser Family Foundation study found that about half of children ages 8 to 18 send text messages on a cell phone in a typical day. The texters estimated they average 118 texts per day. That study also found that only 14 percent of kids said their parents set rules limiting texting.

Other studies have tied teen texting to risky or lewd behavior. A Pew Research Center study found that about one-third of 16- and 17-year-olds send texts while driving. And an Associated Press-MTV poll found that about one-quarter of teenagers have "sexted" — shared sexually explicit photos, videos and chat by cell phone or online.

The latest survey did not ask what students texted or what they discussed on social networks.

One suburban Cleveland student said her texts involve non-sexual small talk with friends, homework assignments and student council bake sales.

"I text with my mother about what time I need picked up," said Tiara Freeman-Sargeant, a 14-year-old Shaker Heights High School freshman. She said she sends and receives about 250 texts a day.

Talking on the phone just isn't appealing to some teens, said her classmate, Ivanna Storms-Thompson.

"Your arm gets tired, your ear gets sweaty," said Ivanna, who also doesn't like the awkward silences.

Like her friend, Ivanna said she mostly gets A's. Whether kids who text do well in school or behave in a crazy, risky way is coincidental, she said.

"It depends on who you're talking to and whether they have their priorities straight," she said. (
Associated Press )


READ MORE - Sex, drugs more common in hyper-texting teens

Cyber warfare 'now a reality' with United States and Russia armed


Cyber warfare 'now a reality' with United States and Russia armed. Cyber warfare is now a reality with at least five nations including the United States and Russia already armed with virtual weapons, according to a report.

A wave of politically-motivated cyber offensives this year – such as attacks on the White House and the US Department of Homeland Security – show that the international arms race is now moving online, a study claims.


Cyber warfare 'now a reality' with United States and Russia armed
A new study reports that the international arms race is now moving online


The report warns that cyber strikes could have a "devastating" impact on national infrastructure with power grids, water supplies and financial markets all at risk.

While the potential of online warfare has long been talked up, the Virtual Criminology Report released by the web security firm McAfee claims that it is now moving from science fiction to fact.

France, Israel and China are among the countries known to have cyber weapon programmes, according to Paul Kurtz, the former White House adviser who complied the study based on interviews with more than 20 experts.

“McAfee began to warn of the global cyber arms race more than two years ago, but now we’re seeing increasing evidence that it’s become real,” said Dave Dealt, president of McAfee.

“Now several nations around the world are actively engaged in cyber warlike preparations and attacks. Today, the weapons are not nuclear, but virtual, and everyone must adapt to these threats.”

The infrastructure of most developed nations is connected to the internet and vulnerable to hackers because of insufficient security controls, the report warns.

Companies will also be caught in the crossfire of future cyber wars between governments because so many essential services are privately run, it advises.

Last month a congressional advisory panel in the US warned that China appears to be using the growing technical abilities to collect US intelligence through a sophisticated and long-term computer attack campaign.

Georgia also accused Russian hackers linked to the government of forcing Georgian websites offline during the real-world conflict between the two nations in 2008. ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Cyber warfare 'now a reality' with United States and Russia armed

Facebook's 'Unfriend' verb is voted ' Word of the Year'


Facebook's 'Unfriend' verb is voted ' Word of the Year'. The Facebook term,‘unfriend’ has topped the New Oxford Amercian Dictionary’s ‘Word of the Year’ list.

The verb, which is used across several social networking sites, has been defined by the dictionary as: "To remove someone as a 'friend' on a social networking site such as Facebook."


Dictionary: Word of the Year
The New Oxford American Dictionary's 'Word of the Year' list was heavily populated with tech-related terms.

This year’s list of new words was heavily populated by tech-related words, such as ‘hashtag’ – referring to the way Twitter users tag their material and ‘sexting’ – which is the sending of sexual texts by mobile phone.

Speaking about the verb ‘unfriend’, Christine Lindberg, a language researcher for Oxford's U.S. dictionary, said: “In the online social networking context, its meaning is understood, so its adoption as a modern verb form makes this an interesting choice for Word of the Year."

There has been some debate across blogs and Twitter, about whether ‘defriend’ is the more commonly used term, especially when referencing Facebook. However, Oxford spokesman Christian Purdy said researchers found that ‘unfriend’ was more commonly used.

Other tech-related words which made the short list were: ‘paywall’ – which is a way of blocking content online unless a user has paid for access and ‘intexticated’ – which describes people who are distracted by texting while driving. ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Facebook's 'Unfriend' verb is voted ' Word of the Year'

Powers to disconnect pirates in Digital Economy Bill


Powers to disconnect pirates in Digital Economy Bill. Illegal file-sharers could have their internet connections cut off under measures included in The Digital Economy Bill.

Initially the Government will try to educate those caught downloading music or films illegally, sending them letters warning them of the consequences of their actions. If this proves insufficient, they could be prevented from going online by their intenet service provider.


The power to disconnect illegal file-sharers has been included in The Digital Economy Bill.
MPs can pay their wives, if they like - out of their own pockets Photo: Marina Imperi

Other elements of the Bill – which aims to make communications infrastructure “fit for the digital age” - includes plans to make the digital radio switchover possible by 2015.

Age ratings will also be made compulsory for all video games designed for those aged 12 or above.

There was little in the bill on how the Government will improve the country's broadband infrastructure - and no mention of the plan for a 50p 'broadband tax' on landline phone lines - but according to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), there will be more details when the bill is published on Friday.

The Government's target that everyone in the country will have access to a basic broadband service of at least 2Mb a second by 2012 was also not mentioned in the Bill, because it does not require legislation, acording to a BIS spokeswoman.

The music industry, who has lobbied the Government hard to tackle illegal downloading, has welcomed the Bill. Geoff Taylor, chief executive of the BPI, said: "It is good news for fans of British music" adding: "The creative sector in the UK needs new measures implemented urgently that address this problem for now and the future if the UK is to lead Europe in giving consumers innovative and high quality digital entertainment."

However internet service providers (ISPs) have been critical of the proposals, and BT claims that forcing ISPs to police piracy could cost the industry £1m a day.

Charles Dunstone, chief executive of Carphone Warehouse, said TalkTalk, the UK's biggest broadband supplier, would "resist any attempts to make it impose technical measures on its customers".

Consumer organisations have warned that plan to cut off subscribers infringes the rights of internet users. ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Powers to disconnect pirates in Digital Economy Bill

Facebook 'fails to protect children'


Facebook 'fails to protect children. Facebook and MySpace, the social networking sites, were criticised last night for failing to do enough to protect children using the internet by a senior police officer responsible for protecting children online.

Jim Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (Ceop) Centre, said Facebook and MySpace could do more to keep youngsters safe.

He said he was disappointed the two internet giants have not adopted a panic button for children who fear they are at risk.

His comments came after their competitor Bebo, now owned by AOL, adopted the ''Ceop report'' button.

The button enables users to report online abuse, bullying and illegal activity as well as offering advice about hacking and viruses.

It was launched just a day after charity Beatbullying pinpointed Bebo and Microsoft's instant messaging service as hotspots for bullying.

The charity polled 2,094 young people across England and found nearly a third (30%) of 11 to 16-year-olds who had been ''cyberbullied'' had been targeted on Bebo.

Mr Gamble said there is ''no legitimate reason'' for refusing to put the button on a website.

He said: ''I do not want my criticism to be taken as a swipe at the online industry. The vast majority of players are doing a good job and doing their best to make the environment safe.

''This is aimed specifically at social networking sites. They are creating a public space that attracts young people, children and adults, so they can make money through advertising.

''We applaud that but do not forget while you do that there is a responsibility, a duty of care, to the young and the vulnerable.

''We are here to help at a low cost, in fact, this is free, we are giving away this service. What cost can you put on child protection? I have seen the horrible aftermath of it.''

Mr Gamble said some sites claimed technical issues block the button while others suggest companies do not want to lose a potentially-lucrative advertising space.

He added: ''It is tiny and does not take up any significant real estate. The bottom line is there is no legitimate reason for not taking it and placing it on a site.''

The Ceop report button allows computer users to report fears directly to the Ceop Centre in central London.

There are also links to 10 other sources of help including Childline and charity Beatbullying.

Up to 10,000 people are already pressing the button every month through other online services.

But there appeared to be some teething problems on Bebo today, with users pressing the Ceop report button receiving a security warning.

The automatic reply said the button connected to an invalid link probably set by fraudsters attempting to steal personal details.

Sir Hugh Orde, president of Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), joined the call for other websites to adopt the button.

He said: ''I think this is a very responsible approach by Bebo and I commend them for it.

''This is an ideal opportunity to keep young people who use social networking sites as safe as possible while they are online.

''I can see no reason why other sites would not consider adopting the same approach and would encourage them to embed the Ceop report button for the benefit of all users.''

A spokesman for Facebook said: "The safety of Facebook users is the top priority for the company, which is why we have invested in the most robust reporting system to support our 300million users.

"We also work closely with police forces in the UK and around the world to create a safe environment. Our teams are manned by trained staff in 2 continents giving 24 hour support in 70 languages.

"We are constantly looking to strengthen our procedures further and are in dialogue with CEOP on this and a range of other issues." ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Facebook 'fails to protect children'

Government unveils new laws to tackle illegal internet downloads


Government unveils new laws to tackle illegal internet downloads. The Government in unveiling new legislation which could see people who illegally download music and films having their internet connection slowed down or cut off altogether.

The new Digital Economy Bill aims to ensure the UK is at the ''leading edge'' of global online industries, the Government says.

Government unveils new laws to tackle illegal internet downloads
Those illegally downloading music and films could have their internet cut off Photo: GETTY

Under the proposed legislation, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) would be required to notify users accused of online piracy.

They would also have to record how many times each subscriber receives one of these notifications.

This would allow the copyright holders to apply for a court order to get the name and address of serious repeat offenders so they can take legal action against them.

But the Bill, announced in the Queen's Speech on Wednesday and published on Friday, also makes provision for the Secretary of State to direct communications regulator Ofcom to develop tough sanctions for illegal file-sharers.

These could include bandwidth capping - where the user's internet connection is slowed down - or temporary suspension of their online account.

The Bill would give the Secretary of State power to require ISPs to impose these technical measures.

Anyone who feels they have been unfairly penalised could complain through a ''clear and effective appeals mechanism''.

The Bill also includes a power to amend copyright legislation to deal with any new technologies that emerge in the future.

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, said: ''Better protecting our creative communities from the threat of online infringement will ensure existing and emerging talent is rewarded, and will bring new choices for online consumers.'' ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Government unveils new laws to tackle illegal internet downloads

Crackdown on illegal filesharers confirmed


Digital Economy Bill: crackdown on illegal filesharers confirmed. Illegal filesharers will face having their internet connections turned off under proposed legislation in the finalised Digital Economy Bill published today, however the Government stopped short of making it a criminal offence.

The bill, which aims to realise most of the commitments set out in the Digital Britain White Paper published in June, has laid out its plans to curb online piracy. The first step towards reducing online piracy by 70 per cent will be ensuring Internet Service Providers (ISPs), such as Sky or Virgin, send out warning letters to those caught file-sharing on their networks.


Lady Gaga
The Government's proposals regarding illegal filesharers, who repeatedly pirate material from artists such as Lady Gaga, have been confirmed in the Digital Economy Bill - published today

The rights holder, who has had material pirated, such as a music label like Universal Music, will pay a fixed fee, set by media regulator Ofcom, to cover the ISP’s costs of sending the letter. Stephen Timms, Minister for Digital Britain expressed his confidence that this method would be successful in ending the majority of the problem.

However, if Ofcom discovers that at least 70 per cent of illegal filesharing has not stopped, Lord Mandelson, the Secretary of State, has the power to apply to Parliament for secondary legislation to force the ISPs to impose technical measures such as the suspension of internet connections. Mr Timms said that Ofcom would be measuring the level of illegal downloading across the UK from “today onwards” but could not give a date by which the government would expect to have achieved a 70 per cent reduction in online piracy.

Mr Timms stressed that such technical measures were “very much the last resort”. “We hope to encourage rights holders and ISPs to work together to find new business models,” he added, referring to examples such as Sky – which has already launched its own subscription music service called Sky Songs.

Other technical measures include: bandwidth capping and imposing a daily download limit.

He also gave his assurance that there would be no criminal penalties imposed by the Government against illegal downloaders. However, rights holders can press charges.

The music industry, which has lobbied the Government hard to tackle illegal downloading, has welcomed the bill. Geoff Taylor, the chief executive of the British Phonographic Industry, said: “The introduction of the Digital Economy Bill is an important milestone towards a sustainable future for British music in the digital age. While the focus has been on measures to tackle illegal P2P, it is significant that the Government has recognised the need for a mechanism to deal with other forms of illegal downloading.”

Feargal Sharkey, chief executive of UK Music – the commercial music industry body – added: ““Our focus is not to disconnect, but to reconnect. To reaffirm and recognise the value of creative works, both to individuals and to the UK economy.

“However, for this market to evolve and flourish there must be breathing space to allow all sides to adapt. Government intervention can provide that impetus.

“In this wider context, our industry continues to develop and partner with emerging digital services. ISPs and tech companies must work with us, and it is imperative that we reach out together to genuine fans of music.”

However, the proposed legislation has been met with opposition too. TalkTalk, the second largest internet service provider in the UK(with more than four million customers), has publicly spoken out against the second stage of the plans which could force ISPs to disconnect illegal filersharers – saying it constituted an infringement on people’s human rights. Last month it launched a campaign against the technical measure called Don’t Disconnect Us – which had 1,819 signatures at the time of publishing and threatened legal action.

Fellow ISP BT has also voiced its concerns about the proposed measures - voicing a preference for court fines for repeat offenders. John Petter, Managing Director of BT Consumer explained: "We believe abuse of copyright is wrong. However, we have real concerns about the government’s plans and the lack of legal protections for accused individuals. We believe that technical measures are not the way forward and that a system of court fines for repeat infringers is preferable. Such an approach would not only protect innocent people, it could also create a fund that could be used to support the UK’s creative industries.”

Andrew Robinson, the leader of the Pirate Party UK – which works to legalise non-commercial internet file-sharing – spoke out against the proposals. “This is a major attack on free speech and human rights. All the benefits of filesharing have been ignored for the benefit of the record labels. Not only is it free advertising for the artist, but it is good for the cultural wealth of the country. No one is excluded from culture if it’s freely available.”

Separately there was no mention in the bill of the proposal to introduce a 50p levy per month on fixed telephone lines to pay for the national roll out of faster web access. This is because the introduction of a new tax, which Mr Timms pledged his commitment to, needs to be included in the Finance bill, which is due next year, before the general election. He estimated that the tax would generate £1 billion by 2017 which would ensure 90 per cent of the UK had next generation broadband. ( telegraph.co.uk )



READ MORE - Crackdown on illegal filesharers confirmed